step 1 · get your message right
You walk out able to say what you sell and who it is for in one sentence, and that sentence holds when a prospect repeats it back to someone who was not in the room. Right now the pitch changes depending on who you are talking to, which is why prospects leave the call saying "let me think about it" and why two people describing your company would describe two different companies.
book a callTwo diagnostic selections route to this box. "Weak value proposition, trying to be all things to all people" is the direct one: the founder already knows the offer is doing too much and wants it cut down to something defensible. "Unclear ICP" tends to arrive alongside it. Both trace to the same root. When the offer is fuzzy you cannot say no to the wrong prospect, so the pipeline fills with people who were never going to buy, the cycle drags while everyone waits for a fit that is not there, and the message only ever converts when you personally carry it.
What you walk away holding, each a real artefact you can use, not a slide:
Sign-off is behavioural, not a handover. It is done when you can say the positioning unprompted, to a peer, without reading it, and it has landed in one real conversation.
Your positioning does not stop at a document. It ships as your Context Pack — named, AI-loadable files (icp.md, offer.md, voice.md) you drop straight into your own Claude or equivalent — so every message, post, email and proposal your AI writes afterwards is built from your real positioning and your buyers' own language, not a generic template. You do not just leave with deliverables; you leave with a capability that keeps working.
Two moves carry this. Offer design fixes what you sell and the problem it removes, so the offer stops flexing to fit whoever happens to be on the call. Positioning architecture sets the frame around it (the alternative you displace, the buyer you claim, the ground you refuse) so the one-liner survives contact with your site and your sales conversations. Pricing falls out of the same work. The positioning names your real competitive alternatives (the biggest is usually your buyer doing nothing, not a rival, and not everyone will assemble the pieces themselves) and why you beat each. That is what anchors the price: not the hours, but the cost of your buyer's status quo, the deals they are not winning and the growth not happening while they stay put. The Jolt Effect names why this matters, most deals are lost to indecision rather than to a competitor, so the work makes the cost of doing nothing visible, which is what lets you hold a value-based price instead of guessing at one. ICP does not get a step of its own; who you are for is a positioning decision, so it gets interrogated while we build the positioning statement, not tackled as a side quest.
Value proposition routes mechanically. When a founder says the offer is "all things to all people", you have already named the problem at the right altitude, so we can move to building without a diagnostic detour first.
ICP routes through conversation. signalrev does not diagnose your ICP from a survey or a checkbox. We get there by talking to you and pressure-testing who actually buys, folded into the same positioning work. If a diagnostic surfaced "unclear ICP" as a selected pain, the honest answer is that we arrive at it with you rather than reading it off a form. Handing you a fixed ICP deliverable would misrepresent how the methodology actually runs.
This is the on-ramp. Offer and positioning come first because everything downstream inherits from them. The presence work (a rewritten LinkedIn profile, website, and content that builds authority) writes from this positioning. The sales system (a working pipeline, a qualification standard, a weekly review) qualifies against this ICP. Start here and the later clusters have something true to build on, instead of amplifying a message that was never settled.
The founder. This is your voice and your offer, so you are in the room for all of it. If a co-founder shares the commercial lead, both of you.
Four to five weekly sessions, about a month. Four most of the time; the fifth is a second pass on the positioning when it needs one before it locks. The £2,000 is fixed for the work, not billed by the session. This is the offer-architecture cluster: offer, ladder, positioning.
We run these about a week apart on purpose, so each piece gets tested against your real world before we build the next on top of it. If you already have one of these under control, we do not run that session for the sake of it. Working this way keeps the work sharp and built around where your business actually is, not where a plan assumed you would be.
Everything downstream. The presence work, the sales system and the advisory layer all write from the positioning locked here. It is the on-ramp — nothing downstream is worth building until this is settled, which is why it comes first.